کور / سياسي / Afghanistan’s Political Dilemma, Continued Occupation

Afghanistan’s Political Dilemma, Continued Occupation

Afghanistan’s Political Dilemma, Continued Occupation, Foreign-Cultivated, Co-opted Leadership
“Massoud worked for us, Massoud kept the Salang open for us…he would not allow anyone to attack us”…Mikhail Gorbachev, BBC World Pashto Service, February 15, 2004
Life is hard. Some things just defy all compassion, logic, reason and understanding, especially so for Afghans, a population constantly under siege in a war-torn country.
Since the advent of the Soviet/Afghan War (1979-1989), the political landscape of Afghanistan has been littered with the hopes, dreams and physical remains of those caught in the cross-fire between invading armies, proxy-militias, collaborators, warring factions, drug syndicates and other external y-driven political entities. Rising from the ashes which they helped to create, the Northern Alliance, with their troubled and sordid history have attempted to reinvent themselves.
At a recent press-conference, presidential hopeful Dr. Abdullah Abdullah exclaimed that the “Government has done little to rebuild the economy, erect infrastructure and bring people out of enduring poverty during Karzai’s ten-years running the country.” But tortured logic and syntax by aspiring politicians with dubious, if not criminal credentials cannot alter the political landscape and thereby regain the people’s confidence with empty sloganeering. The Northern Alliance or National Coalition have and remain the odds-on favorites of Russia, Iran, India and both the Bush and Obama Administrations. And in that role, they have overseen, aided and abetted the Soviet invasion and occupation as proxies, and presently serve as architects or mirror images of their Soviet incarnation in support of the American invasion, occupation and the concept of permanent American military bases. (1, 7, 8, 9) See: The Soldiers Story, Soviet Veterans Remember the Afghan War, Anna Heinamaa and Maija Leppanen, 1994, pp. 113-122.
It is as if one awoke from a bad dream or nightmare to find that the Northern Alliance, also known as, (a.k.a.) The National Coalition of Afghanistan are being groomed by the U.S. Administration to assume the mantle of power in Afghanistan. According to Human Rights Watch, at least 70 candidates with links to the Northern Alliance were on the 2009 presidential ballot. While election laws disallowed candidates with links to illegal armed groups, and the Karzai government had banned some 50 others that had been identified as members of illegal armed groups, many of the more powerful war lords simply bypassed this proscription by registering their militia as a private security company. Also, many of Karzai’s key allies are alleged to have committed widespread human rights violations and war crimes. Human Rights Watch has called for VP Karim Khalili and key ally, former Army Chief of Staff and serial war criminal Abdul Rashid Dostum, to face a special court for documented, certifiable war crimes. Khalili is charged with the killing of thousands of innocent people. Karzai’s other Vice President, Mohammad Qasim Fahim and former Energy Minister Ismael Khan, have been named by human rights organizations as among the worst perpetrators. Marshall Fahim, inveterate drug-trafficker is accused of having served as a former communist secret police chief, murdering prisoners of war during the 1980s and participating in kidnappings and other crimes as well. (2)
As a critical ally of the U.S., Marshall Fahim worked closely with the CIA in the 2001 U.S. invasion of Afghanistan as he had with the Soviets during the Soviet/Afghan War, a pattern of foreign-collaboration that had been established by the late Shura-i-Nizar impresario and media-mogul Ahmad Shah Massoud. (3, 7, 8, 9) See: Main Intelligence Directorate (MID) of the General Headquarters, USSR Armed Forces. Title: ‘The Lion of the Panjshir,’ Article no. 18, (No. 882/83-3-3-S-77, Fond 80, Perechen 14, Document 77), translation of excerpts by Elena Kretova Information Services, Moscow.
A majority of the Afghan people hate the internationalist-powerbrokers angered that they have evaded accountability for human rights abuses, Soviet and U.S. collaboration, and regained power despite the fact they acted as proxies for the Soviets from 1979-1989, and presently for the CIA from the 2001 U.S. invasion to the present. (3) See: Afghanistan, Political Frailty and External Interference, Dr. Nabi Misdaq, 2006, pp. 162, 203-213.
If the 2009 presidential election is indeed an omen of future endeavors, then the 2014 election will as well be characterized by a lack of security, low voter turnout, widespread ballot stuffing, continued U.S. economic and diplomatic threats, combined with unrelenting political persuasion directed at successive Afghan governments and potential candidates to accept and ratify the so-called Bi-Lateral Agreement. A one-sided arrangement favoring the U.S…. a carbon-copy of the previous Bush and current Obama Administration’s anti-Pashtun proclivity, bias and orientation that sacrifices the obvious, necessary wisdom and diplomatic finesse to negotiate with the Taliban while facilitating and or preparing the ground work for a permanent American military basing presence beyond 2014. Undeniably, a presence strongly opposed by a majority of the Afghan people. (9)
Sadly, there are a myriad of additional time-tried election-rigging tactics jeopardizing Afghanistan’s true national independence. As one example, there is evidence that the CIA participated in ballot stuffing to secure a win for their man…Hamid Karzai. The Taliban called for a boycott of the 2009 contest describing it as a “program of the crusader” and “the American process.” (4, 9)
When assessing a candidate’s qualifications for elected office, among the primary essentials are patriotism, non-Soviet, US or other of external affiliation or collaboration coupled with a verifiable-absence of any record of the candidate acting in the commission of war crimes and a genuine working knowledge of the cultural, social and economic needs of the people he or she purports to represent. Those from the Northern Alliance enmeshed in the 2014 election cycle therefore do not possess the necessary qualifications. While few would lament the passing of Hamid Karzai from the president’s foreign-supported mantle of power, fewer still can underwrite or vote for those candidates from the Northern Alliance, formerly known as the IOAP, Jamiat, Shura-i- Nizar, and presently, The National Coalition of Afghanistan.
The act of re-calibrating or re-naming a political entity is generally taken to hide past abuses of power, malfeasance, and or dereliction of duty from electoral scrutiny. Afghans cannot but recall that on 25 December 1999, President Burhanuddin Rabbani trekked to Moscow where in an act of genuflection to Russian President Vladimir Putin, traded away Afghanistan’s right to sue Russia for hundreds of billions of dollars in war reparations in exchange for arms with which to fight the Taliban. A verbatim copy of his groveling letter to the Russian President can be found on pages 450-451 in the first edition of Afghanistan a Search for Truth, and 434-435 in later editions, Bruce G. Richardson, 2009.
The crimes of former Deputy Defense Minister Abdul Rashid Dostum, another of the Northern Alliance luminaries, are legendary in scope. In 1997, according to a recent article in Dharb-i-Mu’men, Dostum is responsible for the massacre of 8,450 POWs at Balkh and Dasht-i-Laili in 1997. The prisoners were slaughtered under orders of Abdul Mailk, deputy to Dostum. Initially, the atrocity was treated as propaganda by the mainstream media and the United Nations Commission for Human Rights who have as yet to investigate the incident. In yet another atrocity, the bloody ethnic cleansing of Pashtuns by elements of the Northern Alliance and their foreign sponsors is also well-known and certifiably documented. (5)
Isabelle Khan of UNCHR has called for war crimes tribunals to be established for Afghanistan from which the U.S. has immunized itself through diplomatic and legal maneuvering. In predictable fashion, former Foreign Minister Dr. Abdullah Abdullah has stated in his self-serving and media-driven logic that any war crimes should be limited to the Taliban regime. “We should forget the past and move to the future” he said. President Obama has promised Physicians for Human Rights that he “would collect evidence of this atrocity and make a decision based on the findings.” This promise was made two years ago. As yet, the president has not undertaken the initiative to convene an investigation of his erstwhile allies in the media-driven war on terror…the Northern Alliance. In addition to alleged war crimes many members of the Northern Alliance have sequestered billions of illegal dollars acquired from various foreign sponsors during their tenure, most of which is invested in the UAE. (6)
Russian, Indian, American and Iranian support of the Northern Alliance is well documented. Within which compilation, it is reputed that Dr. Abdullah Abdullah has strong ties to Russia, the United States and India while others in the National Coalition harbor similar sympathies and loyalties. Thus the question becomes, if history be our guide, will the budding candidates from the Northern Alliance, newly resuscitated as the National Coalition of Afghanistan, represent and pursue Afghanistan’s Russia’s, India’s America’s or Iran’s interests? (7, 8, 9)With the history of the Jihad period recorded for posterity, and serving as a political template…the answer, while troubling is obvious. Were the National Coalition for Afghanistan to assume the mantle of power in Afghanistan, it would without doubt guarantee a continuation of the seemingly endless and ongoing cycle of foreign cultivation and presence, patronage and violence… and they would most assuredly be rejected by a majority of the Afghan people (9)
See: Afghanistan, Political Frailty, and External Interference, by Dr. Nabi Misdaq, pp. 162, 203-213, and Plamya Afgana by Deputy Soviet Advisor to Dr. Najibullah, Soviet General A.A. Liakhovskii, 1999, and 2004, pp.485-486, and 630-674. Also see: Limited Contingent, by Boris V. Gromov, Commanding General, Soviet 40thArmy Afghanistan, 1994. Russian to English translation for the Cold War in History Project, Washington, D.C. (CWIH P) by Gary Goldberg, and see also: Time to Ditch the Northern Alliance, by Frederick Starr, The Wall Street Journal, February26, 2002 and Communications by Members of the Afghan Diaspora about Events in Afghanistan to US Leaders, the UN and World Leaders September 21, 1979-October 7, 2013, by Dr. M.Siddieq Noorzoy, 2013.
Bruce G. Richardson
Notes:
(1) Afghanistan’s Troubling Political Landscape, ‘Asia Times’, B. Khan, 11/02/11, p.13A.
(2) Post- Taliban Afghanistan,’ Afghanistan, a Search for Truth’, Bruce G. Richardson, 2009, pp. 270-273.
(3) Ibid.
(4) Afghanistan’s Troubling Political Landscape, ’Asia Times’, B. Khan, 11/02/11, p.13A.
(5) Post-Taliban Afghanistan, ‘Afghanistan, a Search for Truth’, Bruce G. Richardson, 2009, pp. 270-273.
(6) Ibid.
(7) Interview: With the author and Shahnawaz Tanai, Khalqi Defense Minister, 1988, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, November 12, 1997. Translation by Sayed Noorulhaq Husseini.
(8) Interview: With the author and Ismael Khan, Sarpooza Prison, October 26, 1997.Translation by Sayed Noorulhaq Husseini. Ismael Khan signed a truce with Soviet generals to allow for safe passage and withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan
(9) American Raj, Liberation or Domination, Resolving the Conflict between the West and the Muslim World, Eric S. Margolis, 2006, pp. 196, and Afghanistan, Political Frailty and External Interference, by Dr. Nabi Misdaq, pp. 162, 209-213. 12/27/13. In response to media queries concerning troop and base retention beyond 2014, U.S. Ambassador James Dobbins warned that “My judgment is no troops, no aid.” The Afghans conceivably could stand to lose billions in humanitarian aid.